Stasis,
a word implying motionless in state or development, tries hands in the form of
rhetoric to the point of agreement between different stakeholders and their
claims to the issue at hand. In the
world of crude oil, a “crude” issue is at hand. Money is an undeniable stakeholder that many,
including myself, take for granted without outwardly acknowledging its run of
society. For example, the business
stakeholders believe it will cost the economy too much money to switch to
alternative fuels while environmentalists believe the cost is worthwhile in the
long run to saving our planet. In my
stance, or claim, on the issue I would reach a point of stasis between these
three stakeholders in which funds of compensation would be given to dispute the
“extra” cost of utilizing green fuels rather than oil.
Beginning
with Conjecture, the oil crisis does in fact exist. Since fossil fuels are non-renewable resources
and exist underground at finite numbers even a steady consumption rate would
cause eventual over-exhortation. How
many years of this oil run life do we have left, and what are our options for
the future? While many people are delusional
that such a problem exists, research states that oil will run out between 2025
and 2070. However, this is not a new
statement for oil has been expected to run out and has been rapidly depleting
at an exponential rate since the 1990’s.
Oil is
defined as a fossil fuel that takes millions of years to create by plant and
animal remains and transformed into oil by intense pressure between bedrock and
the layers of soil above. This would
classify oil as a non-renewable resource and a large problem since our society
is defined by the automobile and electricity and technology and even our food
is run by oil companies. Alternative
Fuels such as solar energy , wind energy or even biofuels are created by more
sustainable sources of energy such as the sun and wind and food/plants in our
Earth.
While I was searching different
researcher blogs online such as oildrum.org, I stumbled upon a blog of a woman
named Molly Eagen who is attempting to live 100 days without oil. This enlightened me even more so upon the
value of oil in every aspect of our society.
“This era in history may be
remembered as the "Peak Age," a brief time when nearly all materials
used to power and create our society reach the maximum extraction and
production potential. Past this point, all of these resources become
increasingly difficult to extract until they are no longer economically viable
resources. There are hundreds of examples of resources, currently embedded in
our industrial society, which have reached their peak in the 50 years
surrounding 2010, but the one which will most impact our society is petroleum.
The goal of living for 100 Days Without Oil is to understand the extent of our
dependence on oil in American society today. Specifically how it will affect my
life, as a 25 year old living in Minneapolis, MN. By using myself as a metric I
can take a close and conscious look at where oil dependence occurs in all
aspects of my daily lives: How we transport ourselves from one place to
another, what we eat, how much waste we create, how water is cleaned and
transported, where oil is used as an energy resource, in conventional medicine
and for hygiene and how oil affects how we entertain ourselves and communicate
with others. By demonstrating how someone would be forced to live without using
any oil resources, outlining both what the sacrifices will be as well as the
benefits, we can identify the many systems which will have to be re-designed in
a world without cheap oil, and explore a new way of living in which we live in
an energy balance.” A link to her blog
and further description of her experimental project is in this link: http://www.apartmenttherapy.com/100-days-without-oil-molly-eag-125193
Policies that should be taken
encompass alternative fuels. Other forms
of energy must be implemented in order to sustain the Earth and all life upon
it. Conservation of energy and upgrading
technology to be more oil conscious would help as well. There are many more other policies that could
be taken but more research upon the subject will be needed until then.
I found that I am becoming too
biased on the “green revolution” and “oil is evil” issue and I need to take all
stakeholder stances and become a more neutral investigator. I need to research deeply more solutions and
policies as well as put myself in some oil company shoes as well, think as a
skeptic would and investigate. There is
always more research to behold. A
skeptic would believe that oil will never run out and nothing will happen to
the Earth and an oil company would state that our economy is based on oil and
it would plummet without it. Evidence mostly
on economic issues and proof that oil is a finite resource and its effect on the
environment will help my claim along with how alternative fuels are worth the investment
now rather than later when it is too late.
Joana,
ReplyDeleteI think you did an awesome job of finding lots of different views and stepping into others shoes. To me, it's really powerful that you pointed out that it is very likely that oils won't be around forever, so instead of waiting until we run out, we should start researching possibilities now. Would it also be possible to prepose that if alternative fuels to oil were found that it could essentially help the economy by allowing people to have different choices in the products that they have? That perhaps being given options, would help improve the costs of items or fuels over time.
An example that comes to my mind is the new iPhone 5 coming out, while it is not the same circumstance as oil it is an example of how having different choices can change the price of something. Whenever a new iPhone is released, Apple drops the price of their lower models, which allows people who may have decided against getting such a phone before because of the price, to upgrade to something if they'd like to.
I found it interesting to read about Molly's experience! It shows just how much we depend on the use of oil in the world we live in today.
Joana,
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, I just wanted to mention that the story of Molly Eagen's experience without oil really interested me! It's sources like that that gives a powerful rhetoric to your argument. Truth told, with it in mind, I'm more interested in reading your paper.
Keeping our resources in check is a very important thing, and finding all sides is definitely important. Some people aren't worried at all about it as a resource of energy and instead for entrepreneurial or mechanistic purposes without regard to stores or pollution factors. Definitely keep looking for perspectives, this is a topic where there certainly is a wide range.